
Paper Autoraters
Four LLM-as-judge metrics from the PaperOrchestra paper (arXiv:2604.05018) for scoring research paper quality. You get Citation F1 with P0/P1 partitioning, a six-axis literature review scorer with anti-inflation caps, and two side-by-side comparators (full paper and lit review only). The literature review rubric is strict by design: default range is 45-70, anything above 85 needs strong evidence on all axes, and there are hard penalties for overclaiming or citation dumping. Useful if you're building paper-writing agents and want the same benchmarks the paper used to compare against AI-Scientist-v2, or if you just want a systematic way to score drafts without handwaving.
- GitHub stars
- 572
- last updated
- Jun 2, 2026
Install
$ npx -y skills add ar9av/paperorchestra --skill paper-autoraters --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Files
Paper Autoraters (App. F.3)
Faithful implementation of the four LLM-as-judge autoraters used in PaperOrchestra (Song et al., 2026, arXiv:2604.05018, §5 and App. F.3).
These are the metrics the paper uses to demonstrate that PaperOrchestra beats single-agent and AI-Scientist-v2 baselines. Use them to:
- Score a generated paper against a ground-truth paper.
- Compare two paper-writing pipelines side-by-side.
- Validate your own host-agent execution of the paper-orchestra pipeline.
The four autoraters
Sponsors
Details
- Repository
- github.com/ar9av/paperorchestra
- Categories
- Git & Pull Requests, Code Review & Quality, Data Science & ML
- First seen
- Jun 11, 2026