
Council
Spins up parallel AI judges with different perspectives to review your work, then consolidates their findings into a consensus verdict. Use it for validation when a single test can't capture taste, or when you need adversarial review on architecture decisions, security audits, or migration plans. The debate mode runs two rounds where judges see each other's findings and can revise their positions. It auto-detects your runtime's multi-agent capabilities and falls back gracefully. The mixed mode is clever: runs the same perspectives across Claude and another vendor so you can isolate whether disagreements are about the work or the model. Handles brainstorming and research too, but the real value is catching things mechanical tests miss.
- skills.sh installs
- 3K
- GitHub stars
- 454
- last updated
- Aug 21, 2026
Install
$ npx -y skills add boshu2/agentops --skill council --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Files
Council
Council collects sealed judgments from independent contexts, then synthesizes them so that agreement from one model or one method counts once, dissent and the caller's own decisions survive, and no verdict comes out. Use it when the caller selects several views, or asks you to summarize views already collected, and name the uncertainty that makes the extra contexts worth their cost; routine work needs no council.
| Use instead | When |
|---|---|
| Review | one opinion or look-over |
| Premortem | how a plan could fail |
| Idea Genie | options to build, or one consequential choice for Plan |
| Validate | an acceptance verdict |
Rules that decide the synthesis
They hold for a council you run and for judgments the caller already collected elsewhere (several reviews, subagent reads) and asks you to synthesize. Judgments made against different revisions are separate subjects, never agreement on one.
Sponsors
Details
- Repository
- github.com/boshu2/agentops