Peer Review

You're reviewing a manuscript or grant proposal and need to be systematic about it. This walks you through the full peer review process: initial assessment, section-by-section analysis (methods, stats, figures, discussion), checking reproducibility standards, and verifying reporting guidelines like CONSORT or PRISMA. It's thorough on statistical rigor, covering common pitfalls like multiple testing correction, missing power analyses, and overstated conclusions. The workflow is detailed enough that you could hand it to someone doing their first review. Also integrates with the scientific-schematics skill to generate review flowcharts or evaluation frameworks if you need visuals.

skills.sh installs: 612
GitHub stars: 33.2K
last updated: Aug 21, 2026

View on GitHub

Install

$ npx -y skills add davila7/claude-code-templates --skill peer-review --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Files

Scientific Critical Evaluation and Peer Review

Overview

Peer review is a systematic process for evaluating scientific manuscripts. Assess methodology, statistics, design, reproducibility, ethics, and reporting standards. Apply this skill for manuscript and grant review across disciplines with constructive, rigorous evaluation.