
Paper Self Review
A systematic pre-submission checker that walks you through structure, logic, citations, and claim verification before you send your paper out. It's built around a seven-step review process that includes a claim audit feature to catch overclaiming, where it checks whether your assertions are actually supported by your results, citations, or analysis artifacts. Use it after your first draft or right before submission to catch the structural gaps and unsupported claims that advisors and reviewers will definitely notice. The quality checklist is straightforward and the suggested review techniques like reverse reading and reviewer perspective are genuinely practical. It won't replace domain expertise, but it gives you a repeatable framework for self-review that's better than just reading through and hoping you catch everything.
- skills.sh installs
- 700
- GitHub stars
- 6K
- last updated
- Aug 21, 2026
Install
$ npx -y skills add galaxy-dawn/claude-scholar --skill paper-self-review --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Files
Paper Self-Review
A systematic paper quality checking tool that helps researchers conduct comprehensive self-review before submission.
Core Features
1. Structure Review
Check whether all sections of the paper are complete and conform to academic standards:
- Does the Abstract include problem, method, results, and contributions?
- Does the Introduction clearly articulate research motivation and background?
- Is the Method detailed enough to be reproducible?
- Do the Results sufficiently support the conclusions?
- Does the Discussion address limitations and future work?
2. Logic Consistency Check
Verify the logical coherence of the paper:
- Do research questions match the methodology?
- Does the experimental design support the research hypotheses?
- Are result interpretations reasonable?
- Are conclusions supported by evidence?
3. Citation Completeness
Check the completeness and accuracy of citations:
- Are all citations present in the references?
- Is the reference format consistent?
- Are key related works cited?
- Do citations accurately reflect the original content?
4. Research Claim Audit
Sponsors
Details
- Repository
- github.com/galaxy-dawn/claude-scholar
- Categories
- Git & Pull Requests, Code Review & Quality
- First seen
- Jun 3, 2026
More from galaxy-dawn/claude-scholar
All 28- Review Response568
- Results Analysis553
- Research Ideation548
- Ui Ux Pro Max514
- Results Report502
- Zotero Obsidian Bridge487
- Ml Paper Writing469
- Skill Quality Reviewer467
- Kaggle Learner446
- Daily Paper Generator421
- Obsidian Literature Workflow418
- Bug Detective412
- Skill Improver406
- Latex Conference Template Organizer401
- Post Acceptance391
- Architecture Design387
- Uv Package Manager383
- Git Workflow382
- Web Design Reviewer378
- Doc Coauthoring377
- Daily Coding376
- Code Review Excellence375
- Verification Loop375
- Webapp Testing375