A systematic pre-submission checker that walks you through structure, logic, citations, and claim verification before you send your paper out. It's built around a seven-step review process that includes a claim audit feature to catch overclaiming, where it checks whether your assertions are actually supported by your results, citations, or analysis artifacts. Use it after your first draft or right before submission to catch the structural gaps and unsupported claims that advisors and reviewers will definitely notice. The quality checklist is straightforward and the suggested review techniques like reverse reading and reviewer perspective are genuinely practical. It won't replace domain expertise, but it gives you a repeatable framework for self-review that's better than just reading through and hoping you catch everything.

skills.sh installs
700
GitHub stars
6K
last updated
Aug 21, 2026

Install

$ npx -y skills add galaxy-dawn/claude-scholar --skill paper-self-review --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Files

Paper Self-Review

A systematic paper quality checking tool that helps researchers conduct comprehensive self-review before submission.

Core Features

1. Structure Review

Check whether all sections of the paper are complete and conform to academic standards:

  • Does the Abstract include problem, method, results, and contributions?
  • Does the Introduction clearly articulate research motivation and background?
  • Is the Method detailed enough to be reproducible?
  • Do the Results sufficiently support the conclusions?
  • Does the Discussion address limitations and future work?

2. Logic Consistency Check

Verify the logical coherence of the paper:

  • Do research questions match the methodology?
  • Does the experimental design support the research hypotheses?
  • Are result interpretations reasonable?
  • Are conclusions supported by evidence?

3. Citation Completeness

Check the completeness and accuracy of citations:

  • Are all citations present in the references?
  • Is the reference format consistent?
  • Are key related works cited?
  • Do citations accurately reflect the original content?

4. Research Claim Audit

Sponsors

Details

Repository
github.com/galaxy-dawn/claude-scholar
Categories
Git & Pull Requests, Code Review & Quality
First seen
Jun 3, 2026

More from galaxy-dawn/claude-scholar

All 28
1ruvnet avatarbrowser-screenshot-diffruvnet/rufloVisual + DOM diff between two recorded sessions at matching trajectory step ids; used for visual regression and replay verification697skills.sh installs
2luwill avatarmedical-imaging-reviewluwill/research-skillsUse when the user asks to plan, conduct, document, synthesize, or draft a medical imaging AI narrative review or method survey, scoping review, or systematic re695skills.sh installs
3getsentry avatararchitecture-reviewgetsentry/wardenStaff-level codebase health review. Finds monolithic modules, silent failures, type safety gaps, test coverage holes, and LLM-friendliness issues.692skills.sh installs
4awesome-skills avatarcode-review-excellenceawesome-skills/code-review-skillProvides comprehensive code review guidance for React 19, Vue 3, Angular 17+, Svelte 5, Rust, TypeScript, Java, PHP, Python, Django, Go, C#/.NET, Kotlin, NestJS688skills.sh installs
5akin-ozer avatargithub-actions-validatorakin-ozer/cc-devops-skillsValidate, lint, audit, fix GitHub Actions workflows (.github/workflows).686skills.sh installs
6akin-ozer avatargitlab-ci-generatorakin-ozer/cc-devops-skillsCreate, generate, or scaffold .gitlab-ci.yml pipelines, stages, and jobs.686skills.sh installs