
Safe Debug
When you paste a CUDA OOM error or a NaN loss traceback into Claude and want a careful diagnosis before any code gets touched, this is the skill to reach for. It treats debugging as a distinct phase from patching: you get a diagnosis, a minimal patch plan, and explicit approval gates before anything mutates. The design assumes you're working on research code where a quick fix might quietly break experimental comparability, so it separates "this stops the error" from "this preserves what you were measuring." If you've ever had an AI confidently refactor your training loop when you just wanted to know why the checkpoint won't load, this is the corrective.
- skills.sh installs
- 353K
- GitHub stars
- 486
- last updated
- Aug 21, 2026
Install
$ npx -y skills add lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills --skill safe-debug --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Files
safe-debug
Use this as the Rigor Debug / Rigor Audit skill. The installed slug remains
safe-debug for compatibility.
Use the shared operating principles in
../ai-research-reproduction/references/agent-operating-principles.md; this skill should guide
conservative diagnosis without blocking the model from finding the local root
cause.
When to apply
- The user provides a traceback, terminal error, or concrete training or inference failure symptom.
- The user wants diagnosis, root-cause narrowing, and minimal patch suggestions before code is changed.
- The user wants a safe debug flow with explicit human approval before mutation.
When not to apply
- When the user wants a broad repository walkthrough without an active failure.
- When the task is speculative experimentation or code adaptation.
- When the user is asking for a large refactor or readability rewrite.
Clear boundaries
Sponsors
Details
- Repository
- github.com/lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills
- Categories
- Code Review & Quality, Data Science & ML, Debugging, CLI & Terminal
- First seen
- Jul 14, 2026