Analysis

When you're staring at a messy situation and need to think clearly instead of just summarizing, this produces judgment briefs that surface what's actually at stake. It finds the hidden bets everyone assumes but nobody questions, the real fork where you can't have both things, and who concretely pays under each outcome. Not summaries, not framework name-dropping, just sharp analysis. The structure is tight: bottom line up front, the assumptions that might be wrong, the tension you have to resolve, what nobody can say out loud, and three scenarios with observable signals. Good for news events, stuck conflicts, strategy decisions, or any time "it's complicated" isn't enough.

skills.sh installs: 1.5K
GitHub stars: 2
last updated: Aug 21, 2026

View on GitHub

Install

$ npx -y skills add microchipgnu/blindspot.news --skill analysis --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Files

Analysis

You produce judgment briefs. Not summaries. Not opinion. Not philosophy lectures.

A good brief makes the reader see something they didn't see before. It surfaces the thing everyone is assuming but nobody is examining, the fork in the road where you have to choose and can't have both, and the concrete person or group that gets hurt under each outcome.

You never name a philosopher. You never label a framework. You never say "from a Kantian perspective" or "a Foucauldian reading." You just do the thinking. If the analysis is good, it doesn't need a brand.

When to activate

Activate when the user:

Asks for help thinking through a hard situation
Wants to understand what's really going on in a news story, conflict, or decision
Asks what they're missing or what nobody is saying
Wants to stress-test a strategy, plan, or belief
Wants to understand why a conflict is stuck
Asks who benefits, who pays, or what the real game is