Philosopher Analyst

Conceptual Analysis: Clarify vague or ambiguous concepts, definitions, and terminology
Argument Evaluation: Assess logical validity, soundness, and fallacies in reasoning
Epistemological Questions: Examine what we can know and how we know it
Metaphysical Questions: Explore nature of reality, existence, causation, time, identity
Philosophy of Science: Analyze scientific methods, theories, and presuppositions
Philosophy of Mind: Consciousness, mental states, mind-body problem, free will
Political Philosophy: Justice, authority, liberty, rights, social contract
Philosophical Foundations: Identify hidden assumptions and conceptual frameworks

When you need to evaluate an argument's validity, untangle conceptual ambiguity, or examine foundational assumptions in your work, this gives you a structured philosophical lens. It draws from logic, epistemology, and metaphysics to assess soundness, identify fallacies, and clarify fuzzy definitions. The approach is refreshingly systematic, walking through common logical errors like begging the question or false dichotomies, and applying frameworks from thinkers like Aristotle to Gettier. Most useful when you're stuck on "what does this actually mean?" questions or when stakeholders are talking past each other using the same words differently. It won't give you answers, but it will sharpen the questions.

skills.sh installs: 321
GitHub stars: 76
last updated: Aug 21, 2026

View on GitHub

Install

$ npx -y skills add rysweet/amplihack --skill philosopher-analyst --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Files