Nature Reviewer

You're about to submit a manuscript and want to know what a Nature reviewer will actually say. This simulates three independent referee reports plus a cross-review synthesis, grounded in Nature's editorial criteria: originality, significance, interdisciplinary reach, technical soundness, and readability. Feed it your draft, abstract, or even partial results, and it returns structured critiques that identify who would care about your work, what technical failings block acceptance, and where your evidence doesn't yet support your claims. It won't invent experiments you didn't do or pretend weaknesses don't exist. The three reviewers share the same fact base but differ in emphasis, not fictional identities. Honest pre-submission reality check before the real referees weigh in.

skills.sh installs: 14.8K
GitHub stars: 52.9K
last updated: Aug 21, 2026

View on GitHub

Install

$ npx -y skills add yuan1z0825/nature-skills --skill nature-reviewer --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Files

Nature Reviewer Assessment Skill

Use this skill to simulate a Nature-style reviewer assessment package from the referee side.

This skill is for reviewer-style manuscript evaluation, not for drafting the authors' response. If the user wants rebuttal writing, route to nature-response.