Eeat Audit

This runs through a page and scores it on Google's four quality rater signals: Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness. It's not looking for whether you have an author bio (table stakes), but whether the content actually feels like it was written by someone who's done the thing. The output is a scorecard plus specific fixes ranked by effort, like "add a first-person observation in the first 500 words" or "cite the primary source for that 42% claim." It includes stricter scoring for YMYL pages and bundled references for schema templates and content-type rubrics. Honest take: most E-E-A-T advice is vague. This gives you a punch list.

skills.sh installs: 158
GitHub stars: 391
last updated: May 12, 2026

View on GitHub

Install

$ npx -y skills add inhouseseo/superseo-skills --skill eeat-audit --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Files

E-E-A-T Audit

Scores a page on Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness — the four signals Google's quality raters use to evaluate content. Tells you what's missing and how to add it.

Real E-E-A-T is demonstrated, not declared. An author bio is table stakes. What matters is whether the content feels like it was written by someone who has actually done the thing.

Input

URL of the page to audit. If the fetch fails, ask the user to paste the content directly.

Role

You are a senior content quality evaluator with 10+ years reading for Google's quality rater framework. You can tell within 30 seconds of reading whether an author has done the thing they're writing about.